Coolsculpting vs Ultrasonic Cavitation: Which is Better?

Coolsculpting vs Ultrasonic Cavitation – Overview

If you want to reduce fat with non-invasive, non-surgical treatment, then you must have come across numerous different options in the market. Coolsculpting and Ultrasonic Cavitation are two of the most popular types of aesthetic body-contouring procedures in the United States.

These are extremely popular thanks to their ability to effectively target specific areas of the body, such as love handles, arms, or chin. Some procedures only remove fat from the chin or from another specific area of the body.

However, both these procedures help to remove fat from a variety of areas. Here, we shall take a quick look at the basics of coolsculpting and ultrasonic cavitation and determine the best option for you.

What Is Coolsculpting?

Coolsculpting is globally renowned as a non-invasive and non-surgical option for cosmetic fat reduction. It uses targeted cooling to destroy fat cells in specified areas of the body.

This technique was discovered by Harvard University scientists when they realized that fat freezes at a lower temperature than other parts of the body.

Hence, the targeted area of the body is blasted with cool temperatures. This process kills any fat cells using cryolipolysis phenomenon.

The cool temperature blast does not affect the other types of cells in the body, thus reducing the risk of complications after the procedure. Once the fat cells die, they are ejected naturally from the body through apoptosis or ‘cell death’.

The unique benefit of coolsculpting is that once the procedure removes fat cells from any part of the body, they are unable to retain fat in the treated area in the future, thus preventing fat accumulation and the need for additional body-contouring procedures.

Coolsculpting works by using applicators for targeted cooling. This is effective for use on any area of the body. Most other body-contouring procedures used today can only target one specific area of the body, such as the legs, arms or chin.

However, with coolsculpting, the cosmetic surgeon can blast fat cells from various parts of the body, such as the chin, love handles, arms, thighs, and legs.

The reason that coolsculpting has become incredibly popular worldwide is that the process prevents the growth of fat cells in the treated area. This way, the patient does not have to worry too much about regular exercise.

What Is Ultrasonic Cavitation?

Ultrasonic cavitation is also called ‘ultra-cavitation’. It is also one of the most non-invasive and non-surgical treatments for reducing fat from the body.

The main difference between coolsculpting and ultrasonic cavitation is that the former uses cool temperatures to target and remove unwanted fat cells.

In contrast, the ultrasonic cavitation procedure uses sound waves to vibrate and break down the fat cells. This is a completely non-surgical procedure and effectively gets rid of localized fat along with cellulite deposits from any part of the body.

Ultrasonic cavitation is also comparatively new, as coolsculpting was started more than a decade earlier. In contrast to coolsculpting, the ultrasonic cavitation procedure usually takes a few sessions to get the best results, with each session lasting for an hour or so.

Ultrasonic cavitation works by applying pressure to fat cells using ultrasonic vibrations. High pressure and intense vibration tend to liquefy the stubborn fat cells, which the body excretes over time as a waste product.

Coolsculpting vs Ultrasonic Cavitation: What Are the Side Effects?

Coolsculpting and ultrasonic cavitation procedures have been approved by the FDA for the safe and effective removal of stubborn fat cells that are hard to get rid of using a conventional diet and exercise routine. With that being said, every kind of medical or aesthetic process tends to have one or more side effects and risks of complications.

See Also: CoolSculpting Side Effects

For instance, some people might find the cool temperatures being applied to the skin to remove fat cells uncomfortable, especially if they are bothered by the cold.

Soreness, redness, bruising and swelling are often experienced after undergoing a coolsculpting procedure for fat removal. However, these are temporary and go away in a short time.

Ultrasonic cavitation is considered by many to be a relatively pain-free and comfortable fat-removal procedure. However, some patients report feeling a tingling sensation while the procedure is underway. This is also temporary and dissipates quite quickly.

Coolsculpting and ultrasonic cavitation are both non-invasive and do not require administering anesthesia, sticking needles and long recovery time.

Conclusion

If you are not bothered by a little cold, then you can choose coolsculpting. On the other hand, if you want to have a completely non-invasive and non-surgical fat removal procedure, then doctors recommend undergoing an ultrasonic cavitation procedure.

Make sure to consult with your doctor and cosmetic surgeon to find which fat removal procedure you are an ideal candidate for before making the decision.

Reference links

https://blog.ctpost.com/lifestyle/

https://smoothsynergy.com/ultrasonic-cavitation-vs-coolsculpting/

https://www.newdermamedlaserclinic.com/

https://www.evolvebodysculpting.com/services/

See Also

Is Coolsculting Permanent?

Wood Therapy Tools

Lap Band Surgery Cost Without Insurance

Grants for Weight Loss Surgery